Re: Two DLT Requests For Bluetooth RF Captures

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Feb 16, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Chris Kilgour <techie () whiterocker com> wrote:

> I have established the following two documents that I can confirm will not be changed in any technically-significant 
> way.  There may be editorial changes for typos and the like.  And, if there are any further libpcap-related technical 
> recommendations prior to DLT allocation, I can accommodate those as well.
>
> [1] http://www.whiterocker.com/bt/LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_BREDR_BB.html
> [2] http://www.whiterocker.com/bt/LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR.html

So, at this point, would you rather that tcpdump.org, rather than you, host those documents?

In your case, you could either maintain the packet description and references to other specifications (such as the 
Bluetooth specs, in this case), and have tcpdump.org just link to your descriptions, or have those pages live on the 
tcpdump.org Web site.  I have no real preference for either alternative - whatever works best for you is fine.

The reference to "editorial changes" indicate that it might be better for you to maintain them, so that you can make 
those changes without having to put them up as pull requests on the GitHub repository for the Web site.
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers