Snort mailing list archives
Re: A few pulledpork questions
From: James Lay <jlay () slave-tothe-box net>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:27:19 -0600
On 2013-08-13 12:22, JJC wrote:
Simple... the version of the conf file is used to track features within said conf.. so there were no new directives / options added from 0.6.0 to 0.6.1 of PP.. thus the conf file didnt need revved. However if you look at the svn now (0.7.0) you will see new keywords and args.. thus a revved conf file..
Thanks JJ...is the recommendation to go svn or stay with 0.6.1 for now? James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- A few pulledpork questions James Lay (Aug 13)
- Re: A few pulledpork questions Y M (Aug 13)
- Re: A few pulledpork questions James Lay (Aug 13)
- Re: A few pulledpork questions Eoin Miller (Aug 13)
- Re: A few pulledpork questions James Lay (Aug 13)
- Re: A few pulledpork questions JJC (Aug 13)
- Re: A few pulledpork questions James Lay (Aug 13)
- Re: A few pulledpork questions JJC (Aug 13)
- Re: A few pulledpork questions James Lay (Aug 13)
- Re: A few pulledpork questions James Lay (Aug 13)
- Re: A few pulledpork questions Y M (Aug 13)