Snort mailing list archives
Re: Fwd: Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem
From: beenph <beenph () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:18:51 -0400
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Jack <kingofnerds () gmail com> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Jack" <kingofnerds () gmail com> Date: Oct 25, 2012 9:11 AM Subject: Re: [Snort-users] barnyard2-1.10 major problem To: "beenph" <beenph () gmail com> Last time I enabled the alert on each packet, I just got more alerts, what I think is being requested is to have all the packets in a single alert for one event
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Jack <kingofnerds () gmail com> wrote:
Last time I enabled the alert on each packet, I just got more alerts, what I think is being requested is to have all the packets in a single alert for one event
Thats not really the way it works. Since a event can have multiple packet. At the output plugin level, the output plugin expect a event structure and a packet structure. What the cache does is cache the event structure and when a packet matching a previously triggered event it will call the output plugin with the associated event structure (event record) and the current processed packet. So its the expected behavior. The reason i didin't click right away is that the 2.2 spooler like this by default. and does not need any command line argument. -elz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- barnyard2-1.10 major problem Lawrence R. Hughes, Sr. (Oct 24)
- Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem beenph (Oct 24)
- Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem Lawrence R. Hughes, Sr. (Oct 24)
- Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem beenph (Oct 24)
- Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem Lawrence R. Hughes, Sr. (Oct 24)
- Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem beenph (Oct 24)
- Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem Lawrence R. Hughes, Sr. (Oct 24)
- Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem beenph (Oct 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem Lawrence R. Hughes, Sr. (Oct 24)
- Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem beenph (Oct 24)
- Message not available
- Fwd: Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem Jack (Oct 25)
- Re: Fwd: Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem beenph (Oct 25)
- Re: Fwd: Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem Lawrence R. Hughes, Sr. (Oct 25)
- Re: Fwd: Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem beenph (Oct 25)
- Re: Fwd: Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem Lawrence R. Hughes, Sr. (Oct 25)
- Re: Fwd: Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem beenph (Oct 25)
- Re: Fwd: Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem Lawrence R. Hughes, Sr. (Oct 25)
- Re: Fwd: Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem beenph (Oct 25)
- Re: Fwd: Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem Lawrence R. Hughes, Sr. (Oct 25)
- Re: Fwd: Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem beenph (Oct 25)
- Re: Fwd: Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem Lawrence R. Hughes, Sr. (Oct 25)
- Re: Fwd: Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem beenph (Oct 25)
- Re: barnyard2-1.10 major problem beenph (Oct 24)