Snort mailing list archives
Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody?
From: "evilghost () packetmail net" <evilghost () packetmail net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:39:59 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/18/11 19:23, Jason Brvenik wrote:
Make sense? What's missing?
Performance degradation, elimination of false positives/false negatives as the Internet and applications evolve, etc. If an improvement is made, and deemed and improvement, it makes sense to include it into ET/VRT, or vice versa; remember these are community/GPL rules and not VRT IP. There are two ET sets, open, and open-nogpl, with the open set including GPL rules overlapping with the VRT community rules. There are organizations which only run ET, so inclusion of the gpl rules in the 'open' set makes sense. For dual-subscribers (ET & VRT) the 'open-nogpl' rules make sense. It was decided to not change the SIDs to avoid performance degradation, lack of continuity in the GPL rules, etc. So, if the VRT team makes changes to the GPL rules we'd (ET [1]) appreciate the updates. Conversely, if we (ET [1]) make changes we'd like to submit these to VRT as well, and come to an agreement for the sake of uniformity. [1] I should say I am a ET community participant only and have no profit to derive from my participation. I'm actually speaking presumptuously for ET, but I think there's a desire in cooperation between both organizations. Just bringing you up to speed. Now, it's beer time. - -- It has been said that "hate" is a powerful emotion, perhaps that's why I'm so strong. - -evilghost -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNg/tfAAoJENgimYXu6xOHREcQAIeJqB6fswDUAuqFZaOnmh1L 580kbHvhSKap845SiLWcaYucZ8vtdbKdUZlts2lrLnmlWUEfWkpsF+sQy92hh8As QMWfopV3KpLmlRul8RcqOYot3+Bec/KLuBUJKZjFBvJJ56Mg6BaExjxmZ0x13hLd 2I/RMd1MYWQqZ9ADJ9FKOdPSX9ouiRfQJD6UxwDcUypNSRvAA/TVnyBq6i1XqFpA saP+HwgUyykiFz+YAd4UQUPjGJBBYdivBn4CRVrjsMfLUYo1C6BUTbj78qKdBNHn g6Vvk79TxzUympGVwN+P4XYkU5pHwIEMTPNRCB+YfkpVXnmvL473NAiYqlBqvQwt /7sO6TuemkZK6Gfub4mbpe09xpfNN7GVs3aNoikVVzo2HX6OIwS9FPo3nxP3Qiqj WG5G5HdYYW3ItlDmkzPylH7b8eYYxiIqaKnwODWiCfgEqwTfd1mZJYCRmI+Bd9iJ pyjo1KLX4OliONiu+6OJwdWqNQO3m6UBOwmylC+tZNfqrH/TvxOFk0ojS8Q9Q7a+ S5kcRr1/VUcytCjkOQlTSGDMN8u4m2CPlcT+ZOxXShGImKOgFyrnzjiwYLtH1Oz7 RnaXpEK8ocGhJUl5NHxMNAABe6Fe1DqP/VrqLSSDbGOcVslNW9GwD+f4YanhDdZl wM2+S0Oh2MWyq2CwLT6y =WIlQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 18)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Joel Esler (Mar 18)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 18)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Jason Brvenik (Mar 19)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 18)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Crusty Saint (Mar 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Weir, Jason (Mar 18)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 18)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Jason Brvenik (Mar 19)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? evilghost () packetmail net (Mar 18)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Jason Brvenik (Mar 19)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? evilghost () packetmail net (Mar 18)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Joel Esler (Mar 18)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? evilghost () packetmail net (Mar 18)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 19)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 18)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Joel Esler (Mar 18)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 19)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Jason Brvenik (Mar 19)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 19)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Jason Brvenik (Mar 19)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? evilghost () packetmail net (Mar 19)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Jason Brvenik (Mar 19)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Martin Holste (Mar 20)