Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries
From: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:13:45 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/09/2011 10:28 PM, ambarisha b wrote:
I like "nmap-" prefix because changing the library name indicates that the library might have been edited for nmap as in libdnet.The other two seem to indicate that we have just included the actual libraries with nmap.
If that's a concern, instead of "* = Nmap included" (kept quoted below) we could just have "* = Nmap packaged" or something along those lines.
Cheers Ambarisha
Cheers, Kris Katterjohn
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com> wrote: On 02/09/2011 05:56 PM, David Fifield wrote:1. Use a mark like an asterisk to show included libraries. Compiled with: libpcre-7.6 *libpcap-0.9.8 *libdnet-1.12 ipv6 Compiled without: liblua openssl * = Nmap includedI like this one best of your 3 ideas. It's short and understandable.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNU3QIAAoJEEQxgFs5kUfuNXgP+wRBm1KOOQVBltQ/cx3wJOdT oRN9L+8wXvjLlZIjqzZS6ft/Tccz3NerLWY+Od1YfTo0cNUv+vEDpKmZhtPac2A7 eIzn23wv3Ub0yxu3YIN8VdWg8djSyx4vpuzzuHNOcGwq1SaBcEr7LMdepiJHMIOS 9J596nu+iGIwa9srmBIgbzG5evaDdjRmoUblLVw0iRJ4P+uPE7n/tb4hQIqzemno jYf5GvdFxKhpBrZVLxQg72xOdKejXCW0hfryy+rAAECLFNOwiJAD38WvRS4Wb78I dzO+teP7AVLS+kRbVLIq98GWb91gHtHHwjvJVA484lhYIJ9fubcn/XHXHiVy3dh9 zx6q6DnXyKMFtDw/PlSBKMwCYq7ROhJO2F26TP5COF5UFsxBgU81wbIYnFWmJYnW mgfDFaS5XaG6Uh4eqzBtYXhsI1Wz9UwtjtVLZnX+W9/ZFeejW9sRrQLixqDLU/hO KjBpaI/OKee9aHjAFGDni5lxBT078y0FDSaLPdL7n92gbZN02yON0tlLncdjf1w1 /F3cTfTqSmS7CBWsc7Gv46vsZD/6tACytojxn6l4FCcB556inkmqTbhmvTFAAjUU KejENBnizC9xZjE0RdbKHH7RQ3QqdgbaLuxZAVF1sBPGB87kBDwu0PlPbDged5ZM xTNZtj5yRLyKIhEmwzPk =OZh+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: Version display patch, (continued)
- Re: Version display patch ambarisha b (Feb 06)
- RE: Version display patch Thomas Buchanan (Feb 06)
- Re: Version display patch ambarisha b (Feb 08)
- RE: Version display patch Thomas Buchanan (Feb 08)
- RE: Version display patch Rob Nicholls (Feb 08)
- Re: Version display patch ambarisha b (Feb 08)
- Re: Version display patch David Fifield (Feb 08)
- Version display: included vs. system libraries David Fifield (Feb 09)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries Kris Katterjohn (Feb 09)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries ambarisha b (Feb 09)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries Kris Katterjohn (Feb 09)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries David Fifield (Feb 18)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries ambarisha b (Feb 19)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries ambarisha b (Feb 22)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries David Fifield (Feb 24)
- Re: Version display patch M Z (Feb 09)
- Re: Version display patch Luis MartinGarcia. (Feb 19)