Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Version display patch
From: M Z <zlabs.eu () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:55:31 +0100
Hello, I'm sending tiny patch to Ambarisha's extended version display. I think that it's cleaner not display string "Compiled with"/"Compiled without" when it's empty. What do you guys think about it? Regards, Mariusz On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:39 PM, ambarisha b <b.ambarisha () gmail com> wrote:
David, thanks for the revised patch.I have attached the patch after making the changes that you pointed out. Thomas, thanks for pointing that out.Can you post the error you got on including dnet_winconfig.h ? Regards Ambarisha On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Thomas Buchanan <TBuchanan () thecompassgrp net> wrote:-----Original Message----- From: nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org [mailto:nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org] On Behalf Of ambarisha b Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 10:19 AM To: nmap-dev () insecure org Subject: Re: Version display patch I have attached the patch for -V option.This is the output on my machine. $ nmap -V Nmap version 5.51SVN ( http://nmap.org ) Platform : i686-pc-linux-gnu Compiled with: liblua-5.1.3 libpcre-7.6 libpcap-1.1.1 libdnet-1.12 ipv6 Compiled without: OpenSSL What do you think ? Cheers AmbarishaHi, Unfortunately, this patch breaks the nmap build on my Windows system. Because Windows doesn't use the "configure" script, the libdnet-stripped\include\config.h file doesn't exist, and a fatal error is generated: 4>..\nmap.cc(124): fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'libdnet-stripped\include\config.h': No such file or directory I tried including the dnet_winconfig.h file instead, but that gave a different error message, so I don't really have anything to suggest for you to try differently, but did want to make you aware of the situation. Thanks, Thomas_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Attachment:
version.patch
Description:
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: Version display patch, (continued)
- Re: Version display patch ambarisha b (Feb 08)
- Re: Version display patch David Fifield (Feb 08)
- Version display: included vs. system libraries David Fifield (Feb 09)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries Kris Katterjohn (Feb 09)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries ambarisha b (Feb 09)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries Kris Katterjohn (Feb 09)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries David Fifield (Feb 18)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries ambarisha b (Feb 19)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries ambarisha b (Feb 22)
- Re: Version display: included vs. system libraries David Fifield (Feb 24)
- Re: Version display patch M Z (Feb 09)
- Re: Version display patch Luis MartinGarcia. (Feb 19)