Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns
From: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:06:12 +0100
On 2010-10-21 14:54:31 +0100, Djalal Harouni wrote:
I think we should go for (1) and add a new category "broadcast", and split scripts.
Just to clarify: split only scripts that do not use script arguments to check if they have enough _info_ to run in the pre-scan (prerule) mode. -- tixxdz _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Tom Sellers (Oct 16)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Fyodor (Oct 16)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Patrik Karlsson (Oct 16)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns David Fifield (Oct 18)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Patrik Karlsson (Oct 18)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Djalal Harouni (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Djalal Harouni (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Fyodor (Oct 16)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Djalal Harouni (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Fyodor (Oct 21)
- Re: [NSE] Prerule considerations and concerns Djalal Harouni (Oct 31)