Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Regarding a possible bug..
From: Brandon Enright <bmenrigh () ucsd edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:04:37 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:13:00 +0530 or thereabouts vivek razdan <viveklonewolf () gmail com> wrote:
Hi there Just wanted to ask if this is a bug or not.. I am using nmap on windows. When I use the -d flag with any options (for example -F) in nmap it gives the verbose and debugging information as it should. When I use -dd , all the debugging and verbose information gets suppressed except the --reason output.. So I wanted to share my experience with u. Is it a bug??
Vivek, This isn't a bug but I can see how it would seem like one. -v turns on verbosity and you can use it as many times as you would like either of the form -v -v -v or -vvv. - -d though takes an optional debugging level argument. If you want to use "double debugging" you can either do -d -d or -d2 I think this makes sense. Nmap doesn't really have a lot of verbosity levels and generally -vvv makes more sense and is more standard than -v3 For debugging though, Nmap has 9 levels and sometimes you really do want to do -d9. It would be awkward to do -dddddd.... We could probably make the argument parsing for -d handle either integers or strings of "d". Probably not very high on the priority list though. Brandon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktzyCwACgkQqaGPzAsl94IhywCfdT4fZ3hQkeE0rtY6b35PJ8/7 SUEAn0isCpKtcLnEyFYBXNTXszSMVlgz =gtZf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Regarding a possible bug.. vivek razdan (Feb 10)
- Re: Regarding a possible bug.. Brandon Enright (Feb 11)
- Re: Regarding a possible bug.. Fyodor (Feb 11)
- Re: Regarding a possible bug.. vivek razdan (Feb 12)
- Re: Regarding a possible bug.. Mak Kolybabi (Feb 12)
- Re: Regarding a possible bug.. David Fifield (Feb 17)
- Re: Regarding a possible bug.. Fyodor (Feb 11)
- Re: Regarding a possible bug.. Brandon Enright (Feb 11)