Nmap Development mailing list archives
Preferred Linux distribution for building 32-bit RPMs?
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:21:51 -0700
I currently build the official Nmap 32-bit RPMs on an old laptop running Fedora 8. I plan to (very soon) install 32-bit Linux in a virtual machine instead. I'll then run that VM under 64-bit Linux using VMWare Workstation when I do new release builds. That should be a lot faster than my old T23, and will let me do crazy things with that laptop without jeopardizing the official Nmap builds :). So my question is: what distribution and distro version should I install in the VM? My main concern is portability--I'd like the binary RPMs to work on as many rpm-based distributions as possible. Performance and features (e.g. from using newer libraries) is important, but secondary. I'll probably link to the libraries included with Nmap rather than any which may already exist on the system, and I'll probably link everything I can staticly. I hope to include a staticly linked OpenSSL too (that isn't included in our current RPMs). Has anyone here had problems with the 32-bit RPMs currently distributed on the site (e.g. from Fedora Core 8)? My current plan is to use Fedora Core 10. But other options, such as CentOS, exist. If anyone has reasons for using (or not using) any specific distribution, let me know! Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Preferred Linux distribution for building 32-bit RPMs? Fyodor (Apr 27)
- Re: Preferred Linux distribution for building 32-bit RPMs? Corey Chandler (Apr 27)
- Re: Preferred Linux distribution for building 32-bit RPMs? Gaveen Prabhasara (Apr 28)
- Re: Preferred Linux distribution for building 32-bit RPMs? Corey Chandler (Apr 27)