Nmap Development mailing list archives
RE: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6
From: "Fred" <sfred92 () free fr>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:37:40 +0100
Rob, I had tried on my Vista laptop following versions: Nmap 4.20, 4.22RCx and 4.23RCx, all with 2 main bugs: - wireless interface, now corrected with 4.49RCx - already "failed to open eth4" on Ethernet interface with fixed IP address So, IMHO, I don't see no relation between David's modification and that last bug. Well, strange problem... Fred PS: to keep my network secured, I had to put a top-level security guard. Worf was the right person ;-))) -----Message d'origine----- De : Rob Nicholls [mailto:robert () everythingeverything co uk] Envoyé : lundi 10 décembre 2007 13:14 À : Fred Cc : nmap-dev () insecure org Objet : RE: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 Fred, I can't see anything obviously wrong there. With only one IP address (RC6 includes David's recent modification so --iflist should list every IP address assigned to your adapters), it clearly has to use eth4 both times; I'm not sure why it would work for one IP, but not for the other static one. As you can list the IPs and routes, I think that means WinPcap is happy. David recently changed the way interfaces are handled http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2007/q4/0391.html This fixed problems for wireless users on Vista, and although I haven't noticed any problems with the fix, perhaps it's the cause of your problem (a bit of a long shot, I know)? Are you able to try nmap-4.23RC3 or older to see if the problem was only recently introduced? 4.23RC3 has the added benefit of listing the interface number.
Interesting ports on worf (192.168.10.1):
I like the hostname :) Rob _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 Fyodor (Dec 08)
- Re: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 João Medeiros (Dec 09)
- Re: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 João Medeiros (Dec 09)
- Re: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 João Medeiros (Dec 09)
- Re: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 David Fifield (Dec 09)
- Re: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 João Medeiros (Dec 09)
- RE: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 Fred (Dec 10)
- RE: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 Rob Nicholls (Dec 10)
- RE: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 Fred (Dec 10)
- RE: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 Rob Nicholls (Dec 10)
- RE: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 Fred (Dec 10)
- RE: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 Rob Nicholls (Dec 10)
- Re: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 João Medeiros (Dec 09)
- RE: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 Sina Bahram (Dec 10)
- RE: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 Rob Nicholls (Dec 10)
- RE: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 Sina Bahram (Dec 10)
- RE: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 Fred (Dec 10)
- Re: Most final release candidate yet: Nmap 4.49RC6 doug (Dec 10)