nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute?
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 09:31:06 +0200
On 5/18/24 08:56, Saku Ytti wrote:
As long as our toolbox only has a capitalist hammer, peering disputes are going to be a thing. Cogent has outlived many of its peering dispute history partners. They are the grandfather of disruptive transit pricing, which many others have struggled to meet profitably, and I believe they are a big reason for current transit pricing being as low as it is in the US and EU.
Or to put it another way, if the community thought Cogent was not providing some value to them, they would no longer be in business.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute?, (continued)
- Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Bryan Fields (May 19)
- Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? David Conrad via NANOG (May 19)
- Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? David Conrad via NANOG (May 19)
- Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? John Levine (May 19)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Bill Woodcock (May 17)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? David Conrad via NANOG (May 19)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Mark Tinka (May 17)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Mark Tinka (May 18)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Bill Woodcock (May 18)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Saku Ytti (May 18)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Bill Woodcock (May 18)