nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute?

From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 07:25:39 +0200

On Fri, May 17, 2024, 6:05 PM William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
For those who haven't been around long enough, this isn't Cogent's
first depeering argument. Nor their second.


They’re also still in the middle of one with NTT.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogent_Communications#Peering_disputes

                                -Bill

Current thread:

Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG (May 17)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? William Herrin (May 17)
  - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? jim deleskie (May 17)
    - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Bill Woodcock (May 17)
  - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? John Levine (May 17)
    - Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? William Herrin (May 17)
    - Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? John R. Levine (May 17)
    - Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Bill Woodcock (May 17)
    - Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? William Herrin (May 17)
    - Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? David Conrad via NANOG (May 19)
    - Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? John R. Levine (May 19)
    - Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? David Conrad via NANOG (May 19)
    - Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Bryan Fields (May 19)
    - Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? David Conrad via NANOG (May 19)

(Thread continues...)