nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences?
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 15:58:25 +0300
On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 15:45, Benny Lyne Amorsen <benny+usenet () amorsen dk> wrote:
Juniper's solution will cause way too much packet reordering for TCP to handle. I am arguing that strict round-robin load balancing will function better than hash-based in a lot of real-world scenarios.
And you will be wrong. Packet arriving out of order, will be considered previous packet lost by host, and host will signal need for resend. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences?, (continued)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 06)
- RE: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Brian Turnbow via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Tom Beecher (Sep 06)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 06)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? David Bass (Sep 06)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Saku Ytti (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Fred Baker (Sep 08)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Masataka Ohta (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Benny Lyne Amorsen (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Saku Ytti (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Masataka Ohta (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Saku Ytti (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Benny Lyne Amorsen (Sep 09)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Dave Cohen (Sep 09)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Saku Ytti (Sep 10)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 06)