nanog mailing list archives
Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP?
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 14:29:52 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, William Herrin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:04 AM Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org> wrote:The "other problem" is, every day more gear receiving full routes gets closer to (or farther past) the point where the resources to hold either the FIB or RIB just aren't there. For those using these devices, lowering the bar and bringing in another 100k or so routes in short order just isn't an option.Yeah, but in another couple years we'll breach the 1M mark and everybody will have fresh routers with lots of TCAM for a while. If that were the only issue, it'd be a matter of timing the change well.
Everybody will need them. Not all will get (or be able to get) them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route StackPath, Sr. Neteng | therefore you are _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Justin Wilson (Lists) (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Ian Chilton (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Jon Lewis (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Jon Lewis (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Masataka Ohta (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Jon Lewis (Jan 24)
- RE: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Robert McKay (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? John Levine (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Lars Prehn (Jan 25)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Masataka Ohta (Jan 27)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? William Herrin (Jan 28)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Donald Eastlake (Jan 28)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? William Herrin (Jan 28)