nanog mailing list archives
Smaller than a /24 for BGP?
From: "Justin Wilson (Lists)" <lists () mtin net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 13:19:18 -0500
Have there been talks about the best practices to accept things smaller than a /24? I qm seeing more and more scenarios where folks need to participate in BGP but they do not need a full /24 of space. Seems wasteful. I know this would bloat the routing table immensely. I know of several folks who could split their /24 into /25s across a few regions and still have plenty of IP space. Justin Wilson j2sw () j2sw com — https://blog.j2sw.com - Podcast and Blog https://www.fd-ix.com
Current thread:
- Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Justin Wilson (Lists) (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Ian Chilton (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Jon Lewis (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? William Herrin (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Jon Lewis (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Masataka Ohta (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Jon Lewis (Jan 24)
- RE: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Robert McKay (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? John Levine (Jan 24)
- Re: Smaller than a /24 for BGP? Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 24)