Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers

[Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

On 11/8/22 10:53 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> Hi Grant,

Hi Bill, and everyone else who replied.

> Two problems here:

Thank you for taking the time to reply and help me understand the 
shortcomings of uRPF better.

I wonder if Feasible Path uRPF or Enhanced Feasible Path uRPF might help 
the situation.  However I suspect they both suffer from the FIB != RIB 
problem and associated signaling.

More things to think about.

Thank you again.



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature