nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 12:53:46 -0800
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 12:29 PM Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:
"Reverse path filtering literally says don't accept a packet from somewhere that isn't currently the next hop for that packet's source address."FIB or RIB? I knew of uRPF as available over an interface, per the routing table, not best path available. Or is that implementation dependent?
FIB. The RIB is never consulted on a per-packet basis. It's not built to be fast enough to consult on a per-packet basis. Regards, Bill Herrin -- For hire. https://bill.herrin.us/resume/
Current thread:
- RE: BCP38 For BGP Customers, (continued)
- RE: BCP38 For BGP Customers Ryan Hamel (Nov 07)
- RE: BCP38 For BGP Customers Brian Turnbow via NANOG (Nov 08)
- Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers Joel Halpern (Nov 08)
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers Compton, Rich A (Nov 08)
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers Joel Halpern (Nov 08)
- Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 08)
- Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers Grant Taylor via NANOG (Nov 08)
- Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers William Herrin (Nov 08)
- Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers Mike Hammett (Nov 08)
- Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers William Herrin (Nov 08)
- RE: BCP38 For BGP Customers Adam Thompson (Nov 22)
- Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers Grant Taylor via NANOG (Nov 08)
- Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers William Herrin (Nov 08)
- Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers Grant Taylor via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers William Herrin (Nov 10)
- Re: BCP38 For BGP Customers Jared Mauch (Nov 10)