nanog mailing list archives
Re: Simplified BGP peering solution
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 10:43:41 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Josh Saul wrote:
How many active ISPs are most of the people on this list dealing with? 1-2 - I'm an end user just trying to load balance 3-5 - I'm aggressively looking for the best paths for my "customer" traffic 6-20 - I have a meet-me POP room or a specific business need for so many connections 21+ - I'm an ISP
You should probably rephrase the question in a way that makes more sense to the audience. I suspect you'll find most participants on this list are ISPs (depending on your definition of ISP). Many (most) of us also peer with lots of other networks that may or may not be ISPs in a non-ISP relationship.
What's this "simplified BGP peering solution" you're [not] talking about? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route StackPath, Sr. Neteng | therefore you are _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Rafael Elvira via NANOG (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Bjørn Mork (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Christopher Morrow (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Peter Beckman (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15: 00 UTC John Levine (Feb 04)
- Simplified BGP peering solution Josh Saul (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Laura Smith via NANOG (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Mike Hammett (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Jon Lewis (Feb 07)
- RE: Simplified BGP peering solution Adam Thompson (Feb 07)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Christopher Morrow (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Bjørn Mork (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Shumon Huque (Feb 04)