nanog mailing list archives
Re: Simplified BGP peering solution
From: Laura Smith via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 13:11:04 +0000
------- Original Message ------- On Monday, February 7th, 2022 at 12:18, Josh Saul <josh () netris ai> wrote:
How many active ISPs are most of the people on this list dealing with? 1-2 - I'm an end user just trying to load balance3-5 - I'm aggressively looking for the best paths for my "customer" traffic6-20 - I have a meet-me POP room or a specific business need for so many connections21+ - I'm an ISP
Not sure I understand the point you're getting at here ? Surely for any ISP it will be a mixture of the above ? And if any ISP complains about such diversity of customers, surely they are in the wrong business ? If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen (as the old saying goes) ....
Current thread:
- Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Rafael Elvira via NANOG (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Bjørn Mork (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Christopher Morrow (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Peter Beckman (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15: 00 UTC John Levine (Feb 04)
- Simplified BGP peering solution Josh Saul (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Laura Smith via NANOG (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Mike Hammett (Feb 07)
- Re: Simplified BGP peering solution Jon Lewis (Feb 07)
- RE: Simplified BGP peering solution Adam Thompson (Feb 07)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Christopher Morrow (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Bjørn Mork (Feb 04)
- Re: Slack.com DNSSEC on Feb 12th 15:00 UTC Shumon Huque (Feb 04)