nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 12:17:37 -0700
I think you will find that there are some places in which getting IPv6 network service has been difficult, and as a result even IPv6-capable equipment is not reachable by IPv6. Those are, however, few and far between. Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...
On Oct 23, 2021, at 6:04 AM, David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> wrote: So, in theory, all the root servers should be available via IPv6 and, as far as I can tell, they are.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Lukas Tribus (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Matthew Walster (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Job Snijders via NANOG (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Bryan Fields (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's tim () pelican org (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Tom Hill (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's David Conrad (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Fred Baker (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Christopher Morrow (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Fred Baker (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Bryan Fields (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Bryan Fields (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's David Conrad (Oct 26)
- Re: . (was IPv6 and CDN's) Bryan Fields (Oct 26)
- Re: . (was IPv6 and CDN's) John Curran (Oct 26)
- Re: . (was IPv6 and CDN's) John Levine (Oct 26)
- Re: . (was IPv6 and CDN's) Fred Baker (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Ca By (Oct 23)