Re: Network visibility

["james.cutler () consultant com" <james.cutler () consultant com>]

I don’t remember hearing about IP for VAX/VMS 2.4, but I was part of a group at Intel in 1981 looking at ARPAnet for 
moving designer tools and design files as an alternate to leased bandwidth from $TELCOs using DECnet and BiSync HASP. 
The costs of switching from 56 Kbps to ARPAnet’s 50 Kbps convinced us to wait. Clearly, private demand drove the 
subsequent transition as the TCP/IP stack became effectively free.

 I miss DECUS, but not DELNIs.

-
James R. Cutler - james.cutler () consultant com
GPG keys: hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
cell 734-673-5462

> On Oct 20, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote:
>
> I think the issuing of rfc 791 was much more important than the flag day. ARPAnet was a tiny, tiny universe but there 
> were a lot of people interested in networking at the time wondering what to do with our neat new DEUNA and DEQNA 
> adapters. There was tons of interest in all of the various protocols coming out around then because nobody knew what 
> was going to win, or whether there would be *a* winner at all. Being able to get a spec to write to was pretty novel 
> at the time because all of the rest of them were proprietary so you had to reverse engineer them for the most part. 
> It may be that alone that pushed IP along well before the public could hook up to the Internet. We had lots of 
> customers asking for IP protocols in the mid to late 80's and I can guarantee you most weren't part of the Internet. 
> They were using IP as the interoperating system glue on their own networks.
>
> Also: the flag day was pretty much an example of how not to do a transition. as in, let's not do that again.
>
> Mike, trying to remember when CMU shipped their first version of their IP stack for VMS
>
>
>
> On 10/20/21 11:47 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > Since we seem to be getting pedantic... 
> >
> > There's "The (capital I) Internet" - which, most date to the flag day, and the "Public Internet" (the Internet after 
> > policies changed and allowed commercial & public use over the NSFnet backbone - in 1992f, as I recall).
> >
> > Then there's the more general notion of "internetworking" - of which there was a considerable amount of experimental 
> > work going on, in parallel with TCP/IP.  And of (small i) "internets" - essentially any Catenet style 
> > network-of-networks.
> >
> > Miles Fidelman
> >
> > Mel Beckman wrote:
> > > Michael,
> > >
> > > “Looking into” isn’t “is” :)
> > >
> > >  -mel 
> > >
> > > > On Oct 20, 2021, at 10:39 AM, Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> <mailto:mike () mtcc com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 10/20/21 8:26 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> > > > > Mark,
> > > > >
> > > > > As long as we’re being pedantic, January 1, 1983 is considered the official birthday of the Internet, when TCP/IP 
> > > > > first let different kinds of computers on different networks talk to each other. 
> > > > >
> > > > > It’s 2021, hence the Internet is less than, not more than, 40 years old.  Given your mathematical skills, I put 
> > > > > no stock in your claim that we still can’t “buy an NMS that just works.” :)
> > > > Pedantically, IP is 40 years old as of last month. What you're talking about is the flag day. People including 
> > > > myself were looking into internet protocols well before the flag day.
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
> > In practice, there is.  .... Yogi Berra
> >
> > Theory is when you know everything but nothing works. 
> > Practice is when everything works but no one knows why. 
> > In our lab, theory and practice are combined: 
> > nothing works and no one knows why.  ... unknown