nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:33:32 -0800
On Nov 28, 2021, at 23:19 , Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote: On 11/29/21 00:41, scott wrote:Side note: I recently tried to get /48 per customer with ARIN on repeated emails and they refused. We were already given an IPv6 block a while back. I told them I wanted to expand it so I could give out a /48 per customer and that we had more than 65535 customers, which is the block we got; 65535 /48s. I didn't even account for our needs. Without arguing the reasons, we will have to hand out /56s, rather than /48s because of this. So, it's not all /48-unicorns, puppies and rainbows.We have two types of customers - that that get assigned a /48, and those that get assigned a /56. Mark.
So why be stingy to the second class? Why not just assign everyone a /48? Owen
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Baldur Norddahl (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's scott (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Andrews (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 29)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 29)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Dave Bell (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's William Herrin (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 29)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 28)