nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: scott <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:41:31 -1000
On 11/28/2021 9:47 AM, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
Why not properly assign /48s to customers and /40s to cities? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Side note: I recently tried to get /48 per customer with ARIN on repeated emails and they refused. We were already given an IPv6 block a while back. I told them I wanted to expand it so I could give out a /48 per customer and that we had more than 65535 customers, which is the block we got; 65535 /48s. I didn't even account for our needs.
Without arguing the reasons, we will have to hand out /56s, rather than /48s because of this. So, it's not all /48-unicorns, puppies and rainbows.
scott
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Baldur Norddahl (Nov 29)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 29)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Baldur Norddahl (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's scott (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Andrews (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 29)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 29)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Dave Bell (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's William Herrin (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)