nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 14:21:49 +0100
søn. 28. nov. 2021 13.59 skrev Masataka Ohta < mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>:
But, with manually configured IP addresses, it is trivially easy to have a rule to assign lower part of IP addresses within a subnet for hosts and upper part for routers, which is enough to troubleshoot most network failures.
99% if not 100% of our subnets have either only routers or only hosts + a gateway. So that would be a strange rule to follow. Also very expensive if we are talking public addressing. I find that 10.x.y.z is not much if you want to have a system in your subnet numbering. With ipv6 there is much more space to enable systematic numbering schemes.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's sronan (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Baldur Norddahl (Nov 29)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 29)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Baldur Norddahl (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's scott (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Andrews (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 29)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 29)