nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:30:13 -0800
On 11/27/21 2:22 PM, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
40% in isolation is pretty meaningless. If it's 40% of .1% overall it's called a rounding error.Actually, I think it’s in the fine print here… “Connection setup is 1.4 times faster”. I can believe that NAT adds almost 40% overhead to the connection setup (3-way handshake) and some of the differences in packet handling in the fast path between v4 and v6 could contribute the small remaining difference. I doubt it is due to different connections, since we’re talking about measurements against dual-stack sites reached from dual-stack end-users, very likely traversing similar paths.
Mike
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's JCLB (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's William Herrin (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Dave Taht (Nov 28)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Grzegorz Janoszka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Christopher Morrow (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Fred Baker (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)