nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 11:21:07 -0800
On Nov 27, 2021, at 06:05 , Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote: On 11/27/21 02:15, Jean St-Laurent via NANOG wrote:We now have apple and fb saying ipv6 is faster than ipv4. If we can onboard Amazon, Netflix, Google and some others, then it is a done deal that ipv6 is indeed faster than ipv4. Hence, an easy argument to tell your CFO that you need IPv6 for your CDN.Could work for CDN's... but what about the CFO of an ISP or MNO? Mark.
Shouldn’t the argument that we can reduce our CGN spend by 50-80% work there? Especially when you couple it with the argument that IPv6 deployment will likely reduce CGN related support calls which are one of the biggest expenses for most ISP/MNOs? Owen
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Gary Buhrmaster (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's JCLB (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's William Herrin (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Dave Taht (Nov 28)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Grzegorz Janoszka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)