nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 20:21:03 -0500
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021, 17:36 Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
Well, 1.4x faster is a bit of an odd metric. I presume that means that connection set up times measured were on average 1/1.4 times as long for IPv6 as they were for IPv4, but there are other possible interpretations. So really, that’s a convoluted way of saying it takes 29% less time to set up an IPv6 connection than an IPv4 connection on average. I can believe that is likely in a scenario where one is dealing with IPv4 NAT overhead.
Why isn't this just inconsistent paths between V6 and V4/nat? (Divergent topologies)
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's JCLB (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's William Herrin (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Dave Taht (Nov 28)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Grzegorz Janoszka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Christopher Morrow (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Fred Baker (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)