nanog mailing list archives

Re: multihoming

From: Geoff Huston <gih () apnic net>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 22:12:21 +0000

On 25 Nov 2021, at 7:57 am, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:

Are you proposing SCTP? There is sadly not much more hope for widespread adoption of that as of IPv6.

or perhaps MP-TCP? :)  or shim6?


Shim6 died a comprehensive death many yers ago. I recall NANOG played a role in it's untimely demise. :-)

Geoff

Current thread:

Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying, (continued)
- - - Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 22)
    - Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 22)
    - Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
    - Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 23)
    - Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
    - multihoming Dave Taht (Nov 23)
    - Re: multihoming Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
    - Re: multihoming Baldur Norddahl (Nov 24)
    - Re: multihoming Saku Ytti (Nov 24)
    - Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow (Nov 24)
    - Re: multihoming Geoff Huston (Nov 24)
    - Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow (Nov 24)
    - Re: multihoming Bjørn Mork (Nov 25)
    - Re: multihoming Michael Thomas (Nov 25)
    - Re: multihoming Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
    - Re: multihoming Masataka Ohta via NANOG (Nov 24)
    - Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 21)
    - Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Eliot Lear (Nov 21)
    - Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Lincoln Dale (Nov 22)
    - Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Dave Taht (Nov 18)
    - Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon (Nov 18)

(Thread continues...)