nanog mailing list archives
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast
From: Eliot Lear <lear () ofcourseimright com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 09:33:14 +0100
Greetings John and all On 18.11.21 21:54, John Gilmore wrote:
We succeeded in upgrading every end-node and every router in the Internet in the late '90s and early 2000's, when we deployed CIDR. It was doable. We know that because we did it! (And if we hadn't done it, the Internet would not have scaled to world scale.)
I want to highlight one (hopefully) entertaining point. There is evidence in Geoff's and Tony's graphs of when all of this happened because there was a drop in the number of routes in 1994. If you squint, you can see it here <https://bgp.potaroo.net/> just at the lower left-hand side of the graph. It's really funny to me because the scale of that graph has changed *dramatically* – bordering on two orders of magnitude. At the time the dip was a substantial percentage of the routes at the time.
I will also point out that even though endpoints by-and-large were not involved, keeping the routers from falling down nevertheless was the result of an enormous effort and collaboration between researchers, developers, and operators, who I doubt very much would ever want to repeat that sort of experience.
Eliot
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33_and_old_rev.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: multihoming, (continued)
- Re: multihoming Baldur Norddahl (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Saku Ytti (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Geoff Huston (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Bjørn Mork (Nov 25)
- Re: multihoming Michael Thomas (Nov 25)
- Re: multihoming Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: multihoming Masataka Ohta via NANOG (Nov 24)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 21)
- Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Eliot Lear (Nov 21)
- Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Lincoln Dale (Nov 22)
- Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Dave Taht (Nov 18)
- Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon (Nov 18)
- Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon (Nov 19)
- Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast John Gilmore (Nov 19)
- Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 20)
- Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Message not available
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Mark Andrews (Nov 17)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon (Nov 17)