nanog mailing list archives
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:42:01 +0900
Owen DeLong wrote:
Again, wrong. The number is growing exponentially primarily because of the fragmentation that comes from recycling addresses.
Nope… It occurs when (e.g. HP or MIT or AMPR) sell off pieces of a class A as smaller prefixes to various other purchasers.
That, by no means, is not recycling. Moreover, most, if not all, entities purchasing address ranges use them with multihoming. > ROFLMAO you are demonstrating your extreme detachment from reality: So, you have never thought about the reason why people buy IP addresses. >> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ohta-e2e-multihoming-02.txt > > THat's not one of the alternatives I was talking about. That you haven't mentioned any alternative and have talked about nothing is your problem. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying, (continued)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Saku Ytti (Nov 20)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying j k (Nov 23)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 20)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 20)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 21)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Måns Nilsson (Nov 21)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 22)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 22)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 23)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
- multihoming Dave Taht (Nov 23)
- Re: multihoming Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
- Re: multihoming Baldur Norddahl (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Saku Ytti (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Geoff Huston (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Bjørn Mork (Nov 25)
- Re: multihoming Michael Thomas (Nov 25)
- Re: multihoming Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)