nanog mailing list archives

Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?


From: Bryan Fields <Bryan () bryanfields net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 20:47:23 -0400

On 3/20/21 2:06 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic.
in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in
it being the de facto global anything-ops list.  perhaps we do not
need to fix that.

+1

-- 
Bryan Fields

727-409-1194 - Voice
http://bryanfields.net


Current thread: