nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:29:42 -0800
On Feb 11, 2021, at 05:55 , Izaac <izaac () setec org> wrote: On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 04:04:43AM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:without creating partitioned networks.Ridiculous. Why would you establish such a criteria? The defining characteristic of rfc1918 networks is that they are partitioned. The ability to recognize and exploit partitions within a network, natural or otherwise, is the measure of competence in a network engineer. Stop making excuses.
Ridiculous… TCP/IP was designed to be a peer to peer system where each endpoint was uniquely addressable whether reachable by policy or not. IPv6 restores that ability and RFC-1918 is a bandaid for an obsolete protocol. Stop making excuses and let’s fix the network. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bjørn Mork (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Jim Shankland (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Tim Howe (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Tom Beecher (Feb 12)
- Re: DoD IP Space Christopher Morrow (Feb 12)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Michael Thomas (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Kenneth J. Dupuis (Feb 15)