nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:13:12 +0200
On 2/10/21 19:50, Doug Barton wrote:
I also reject the premise that any org, no matter how large, needs to uniquely number every endpoint. When I was doing IPAM for a living, not allowing the workstations in Tucson to talk to the printers in Singapore was considered a feature.
Preventing communication exchange between devices does not have to be driven by their IP addressing.
I even had one customer who wanted the printers to all have the same (1918) IP address in every office because they had a lot of sales people who traveled between offices who couldn't handle reconfiguring every time they visited a new location. I thought it was a little too precious personally, but the customer is always right. :)
It's 2021 - Bonjour. You're welcome :-). Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 09)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Valdis Klētnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Ca By (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bjørn Mork (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Ca By (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bjørn Mork (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Ca By (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 09)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bjørn Mork (Feb 10)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 11)