nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:51:36 -0800
On 2/11/21 5:41 PM, Izaac wrote:
IPv6 restores that ability and RFC-1918 is a bandaid for an obsolete protocol.So, in your mind, IPv4 was "obsolete" in 1996 -- almost three years before IPv6 was even specified? Fascinating. I could be in no way mistaken for an IPv4/NAT apologist, but that one's new on me.
ipv6 was on my radar in the early 90's. it was definitely at least 1993, maybe earlier.
Mike
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Jim Shankland (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Tim Howe (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Tom Beecher (Feb 12)
- Re: DoD IP Space Christopher Morrow (Feb 12)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Michael Thomas (Feb 11)
- Re: DoD IP Space Kenneth J. Dupuis (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space james.cutler () consultant com (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space Sabri Berisha (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space Valdis Klētnieks (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space james.cutler () consultant com (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space Fred Baker (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space Joe Loiacono (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space Gary Buhrmaster (Feb 15)
- Re: DoD IP Space bzs (Feb 15)