nanog mailing list archives
Re: interesting troubleshooting
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 19:17:40 +0200
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 at 16:25, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
So the latter. We used both FAT + entropy to provide even load balancing of l2vpn payloads in the edge and core, with little success.
You don't need both. My rule of thumb, green field, go with entropy and get all the services in one go. Brown field, go FAT, and target just PW, ensure you also have CW, then let transit LSR balance MPLS-IP. With entropy label you can entirely disable transit LSR payload heuristics. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: interesting troubleshooting, (continued)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Matthew Petach (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Chris Adams (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Steve Meuse (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- RE: interesting troubleshooting adamv0025 (Mar 23)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)