nanog mailing list archives
Re: interesting troubleshooting
From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz () forthnet gr>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 18:52:10 +0200
Mark Tinka wrote on 21/3/20 18:15:
So the three or four times we tried to get FAT going (in a multi-vendor network), it simply didn't work. Have you (or anyone else) had any luck with it, in practice? Mark.
Only between Cisco boxes. I still don't understand why the vendors cannot make it work in one direction only (the low-end platform would only need to remove an extra label, no need to inspect traffic). That would help us a lot, since the majority of our traffic is downstream to the customer. -- Tassos
Current thread:
- Re: interesting troubleshooting, (continued)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Steve Meuse (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Steve Meuse (Mar 20)
- RE: interesting troubleshooting adamv0025 (Mar 23)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)