nanog mailing list archives
Re: interesting troubleshooting
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 18:25:30 +0200
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 18:19, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
So the three or four times we tried to get FAT going (in a multi-vendor network), it simply didn't work.
Yeah we run it in a multivendor network (JNPR, CSCO, NOK), works. I would also recommend people exclusively using CW+FAT and disabling LSR payload heuristics (JNPR default, but by default won't do with CW, can do with CW too). -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: interesting troubleshooting, (continued)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Brandon Martin (Mar 24)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting William Herrin (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Matthew Petach (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Matthew Petach (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Matthew Petach (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Chris Adams (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Steve Meuse (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- RE: interesting troubleshooting adamv0025 (Mar 23)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 22)