nanog mailing list archives
Re: Partial vs Full tables
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 13:28:33 -0500 (CDT)
I still know many ISPs that don't even come close to needing 1G of capacity and they serve hundreds of customers. I'd say it's still relevant. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Hilliard" <nick () foobar org> To: "William Herrin" <bill () herrin us> Cc: "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 1:14:01 PM Subject: Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin wrote on 08/06/2020 18:53:
4 gigs and 2 cores is more than sufficient for a 1 gbps router at the current 800k routes
1gbps is residential access speed. Is this still useful in the dfz? Nick
Current thread:
- Re: Partial vs Full tables, (continued)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Yang Yu (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Ryan Woolley (Jun 07)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 07)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Baldur Norddahl (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Nick Hilliard (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Joe Greco (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mike Hammett (Jun 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Josh Hoppes (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Anoop Ghanwani (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mike Hammett (Jun 06)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Tom Beecher (Jun 05)