nanog mailing list archives
Re: Partial vs Full tables
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:02:21 +0200
On 5/Jun/20 18:30, Michael Hare via NANOG wrote:
I'm considering an approach similar to Tore's blog where at some point I keep the full RIB but selectively populate the FIB. Tore, care to comment on why you decided to filter the RIB as well?
We do this in the Metro, where FIB is limited, but prefer to avoid eBGP Multi-Hop for downstream customers that want a full feed. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Partial vs Full tables, (continued)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Nick Hilliard (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Joe Greco (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mike Hammett (Jun 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Josh Hoppes (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Anoop Ghanwani (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 08)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mike Hammett (Jun 06)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Tom Beecher (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Baldur Norddahl (Jun 05)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Ryan Rawdon (Jun 06)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 10)