nanog mailing list archives
RE: Partial vs Full tables
From: Brian Turnbow via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 07:44:33 +0000
Hi all,
Loose mode RPF will essentially drop traffic received on the interface if the router does not have any route for. (will not match a default or a discard route, at least in IOS-XR) As Bill has pointed out, this may drop traffic from some peering networks that are not in the global routing table. Though one could argue that if a packet needs to be fragged it's typically closer to the edges rather than the transit/peering links.
No one has mentioned it , but you can also use an acl combined with urpf. You could even go so far as permiting everything and just using urpf for rtbh purposes. Brian
Current thread:
- Re: Partial vs Full tables, (continued)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Alejandro Acosta (Jun 09)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Robert Blayzor (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Brian Johnson (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Baldur Norddahl (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Chris Adams (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Robert Blayzor (Jun 11)
- RE: Partial vs Full tables Brian Turnbow via NANOG (Jun 12)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 10)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables brad dreisbach (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 11)
- RE: Partial vs Full tables Drew Weaver (Jun 15)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 15)
- RE: Partial vs Full tables Drew Weaver (Jun 15)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Brian Johnson (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Brian Johnson (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Brian Johnson (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 11)