nanog mailing list archives
Re: Partial vs Full tables
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:11:44 -0700
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 9:35 AM Brian Johnson <brian.johnson () netgeek us> wrote:
You are a dismissive little twit aren’t you. :/
Someone stood up and said, "Nope, nothing I did could possibly have broken anything." I'm pretty sure that someone was you but feel free to call me on it if I'm mistaken. Look, at the risk of doing further offense, it's like I said: it's one thing to educate yourself about a topic and then make a judgement call about what's acceptable. It's quite another to remain willfully ignorant in service of your preferred view. I just got through describing specific scenarios where loose urpf fails when you responded that no, it doesn't break anything. If you'd said, "no, that breakage is a small price worth paying," I'd have debated the merits with you or simply let it stand as a contrary opinion. Refusing to acknowledge the breakage is worth only dismissal. Regards, Bill -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- RE: Partial vs Full tables, (continued)
- RE: Partial vs Full tables Brian Turnbow via NANOG (Jun 12)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables brad dreisbach (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 11)
- RE: Partial vs Full tables Drew Weaver (Jun 15)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Saku Ytti (Jun 15)
- RE: Partial vs Full tables Drew Weaver (Jun 15)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Brian Johnson (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Brian Johnson (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Brian Johnson (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables William Herrin (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Brian Johnson (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 11)
- RE: Partial vs Full tables Michael Hare via NANOG (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Mark Tinka (Jun 11)
- Re: Partial vs Full tables Baldur Norddahl (Jun 08)