nanog mailing list archives
Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that
From: Jeff Shultz <jeffshultz () sctcweb com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:01:42 -0800
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 1:47 AM tim () pelican org <tim () pelican org> wrote:
On Friday, 14 February, 2020 09:17, "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu> said:After all - it's not like *they* are going to feel the pain of a single 106G upload, it's somebody else who feels the pain of 5 million downloads of a 106G image refresh. Economists call this sort of thing an "externality".I must admit, I'm blissfully unaware of CDN commercials, but I'd have expected that if I give a CDN my binary 100G binary blob and six people download it, I'd be billed a different amount to if six million people download it - and similarly if that blob is 1G vs 100G. I guess I'm asking if there's an underlying problem with the model here, or if it's just the details of the numbers that are "wrong" in encouraging / discouraging certain behaviours. Regards, Tim.
I just wish "they" would remember that their ultimate customers don't usually have 10G pipes - they have 6M and 10M pipes that may take hours, if not days, to download one of these mega blobs. -- Jeff Shultz -- Like us on Social Media for News, Promotions, and other information!! <https://www.facebook.com/SCTCWEB/> <https://www.instagram.com/sctc_503/> <https://www.yelp.com/biz/sctc-stayton-3> <https://www.youtube.com/c/sctcvideos> _**** This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. ****_
Current thread:
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that, (continued)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Mike Hammett (Feb 12)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Tom Deligiannis (Feb 12)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Chris Adams (Feb 12)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Carsten Bormann (Feb 12)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Tom Beecher (Feb 13)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Ahmed Borno (Feb 13)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Brandon Martin (Feb 13)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Valdis Klētnieks (Feb 14)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that tim () pelican org (Feb 14)
- RE: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that jdambrosia (Feb 14)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Jeff Shultz (Feb 14)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Andy Ringsmuth (Feb 14)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Jeff Shultz (Feb 14)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Tom Deligiannis (Feb 14)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Brandon Martin (Feb 14)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Mike Hammett (Feb 14)
- RE: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Aaron Gould (Feb 14)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Mark Tinka (Feb 16)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Mike Hammett (Feb 14)
- RE: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Aaron Gould (Feb 12)
- Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that Seth Mattinen (Feb 12)