RE: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

[<jdambrosia () gmail com>]

All,
There has been some initial discussions about beyond 400G for Ethernet.  It would be interesting to better understand 
how often this problem is now occurring - because I would imagine the problem is only going to get worse as the "binary 
blob" blobs out, which will only stress networks more.

Regards

John

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> On Behalf Of tim () pelican org
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 4:46 AM
To: NANOG list <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

On Friday, 14 February, 2020 09:17, "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu> said:

> After all - it's not like *they* are going to feel the pain of a 
> single 106G upload, it's somebody else who feels the pain of 5 million 
> downloads of a 106G image refresh.
>
> Economists call this sort of thing an "externality".

I must admit, I'm blissfully unaware of CDN commercials, but I'd have expected that if I give a CDN my binary 100G 
binary blob and six people download it, I'd be billed a different amount to if six million people download it - and 
similarly if that blob is 1G vs 100G.

I guess I'm asking if there's an underlying problem with the model here, or if it's just the details of the numbers 
that are "wrong" in encouraging / discouraging certain behaviou

Regards,
Tim.