nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10g residential CPE
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 21:35:51 +0200
On 12/28/20 19:48, Darin Steffl wrote:
Aaron,The "Free" service doesn't cover your cost of support which is much higher for residential than any business customer. Our residential customers call at least 15x more often compared to business customers compared on a 1:1 ratio.I honestly can't fathom providing free residential service because we make enough money on the business side of things. You should be charging something, at least $20-30 per month.
Why "should" they be doing anything?If their Metro fibre business allows them some change to prop the rest of their community up in a way that does not put them out, who are we to say they need to conform to what our "gold standard" of economics is?
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: 10g residential CPE, (continued)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mel Beckman (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Aaron Wendel (Dec 28)
- Message not available
- Re: 10g residential CPE Aaron Wendel (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Jay R. Ashworth (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Aaron Wendel (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Ben Cannon (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 28)
- RE: 10g residential CPE Keith Medcalf (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Darin Steffl (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Ben Cannon (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Aaron Wendel (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mike Hammett (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 30)