![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 18:02:26 -0700
On 10/3/19 5:34 PM, John Levine wrote:
In article<CAOVYXj-DWX0FhcEJdPMBfec6HcykWtRrErC8wDuBDYYFmE_cWQ () mail gmail com> you write:that gets me on to my small annoyance... /64 bit subnet masks for local networks. really?Yup.
Making everything is a /64 is the best because means never again having to waste brain cycles on right-sizing subnets. And the total space is large enough that you're not shooting yourself in the foot anytime soon.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Alan Buxey (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment John Levine (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Seth Mattinen (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 02)
- RE: IPv6 Pain Experiment Naslund, Steve (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Palmer (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 03)
- RE: IPv6 Pain Experiment Naslund, Steve (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Alan Buxey (Oct 03)
- RE: IPv6 Pain Experiment Aaron Gould (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment James R Cutler (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Owen DeLong (Oct 04)
- RE: IPv6 Pain Experiment Michel Py (Oct 04)