nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment
From: George Michaelson <ggm () algebras org>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:14:52 +1000
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:12 PM Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:
George Michaelson wrote:Or, why we even have SRC in the header: it does not inform routing.Primarily for ICMP.
Could look inside beyond first header state to see DST as payload. optimisation for ICMP feels like premature optimisation. But, its semi-rational. Frag which dropped this, was going to make IP difficult for any real use anyway, not bothered by the corner-case breaks. Coulda Woulda Shoulda -G
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Harris (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment John R. Levine (Oct 02)
- RE: IPv6 Pain Experiment Naslund, Steve (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Hoppes (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Hoppes (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Alan Buxey (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment John Levine (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Seth Mattinen (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 02)
- RE: IPv6 Pain Experiment Naslund, Steve (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Palmer (Oct 03)