nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment

From: "John R. Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 2 Oct 2019 18:00:32 -0400

On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, Matt Harris wrote:

I think ultimately the perception of the work required to deploy IPv6 is a
much greater hurdle to IPv6 adoption than the actual work required to
deploy IPv6.


I'm describing my actual experience, so we'll have to disagree here.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl () taugh com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

Current thread:

IPv6 Thought Experiment Antonios Chariton (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Antonios Chariton (Oct 02)
  - RE: IPv6 Thought Experiment Naslund, Steve (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Dovid Bender (Oct 02)
  - Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment Matt Harris (Oct 02)
    - RE: IPv6 Thought Experiment Naslund, Steve (Oct 02)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment John Levine (Oct 02)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Harris (Oct 02)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment John R. Levine (Oct 02)
    - RE: IPv6 Pain Experiment Naslund, Steve (Oct 02)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Hoppes (Oct 02)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 02)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Hoppes (Oct 02)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 02)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment George Michaelson (Oct 02)
    - Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)

(Thread continues...)