nanog mailing list archives
Re: CloudFlare issues?
From: Filip Hruska <fhr () fhrnet eu>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:40:35 +0000
Verizon is the one who should've noticed something was amiss and dropped their customer's BGP session. They also should have had filters and prefix count limits in place, which would have prevented this whole disaster.
As to why any of that didn't happen, who actually knows. Regards, Filip On 6/24/19 4:28 PM, Max Tulyev wrote:
Why almost all carriers did not filter the leak on their side, but waited for "a better weather on Mars" for several hours?
-- Filip Hruska Linux System Administrator
Current thread:
- Re: Are network operators morons? [was: CloudFlare issues?], (continued)
- Re: Are network operators morons? [was: CloudFlare issues?] Sean Donelan (Jun 25)
- Re: Are network operators morons? [was: CloudFlare issues?] Randy Bush (Jun 25)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Stephen Satchell (Jun 25)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Aftab Siddiqui (Jun 25)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Ca By (Jun 25)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Mark Tinka (Jun 24)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Fredrik Korsbäck (Jun 24)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Filip Hruska (Jun 24)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Verizon Routing issue Jared Mauch (Jun 24)
- Re: Verizon Routing issue ML (Jun 24)
- Re: Verizon Routing issue Jared Mauch (Jun 24)
- Re: Verizon Routing issue Max Tulyev (Jun 24)
- Re: Verizon Routing issue Jared Mauch (Jun 24)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Max Tulyev (Jun 24)