nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verizon Routing issue
From: Max Tulyev <maxtul () netassist ua>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:12:15 +0300
24.06.19 17:44, Jared Mauch пише:
1. Why Cloudflare did not immediately announced all their address space by /24s? This can put the service up instantly for almost all places.They may not want to pollute the global routing table with these entries. It has a cost for everyone. If we all did this, the table would be a mess.
yes, it is. But it is a working, quick and temporary fix of the problem.
2. Why almost all carriers did not filter the leak on their side, but waited for "a better weather on Mars" for several hours?There’s several major issues here - Verizon accepted garbage from their customer - Other networks accepted the garbage from Verizon (eg: Cogent) - known best practices from over a decade ago are not applied
That's it.We have several IXes connected, all of them had a correct aggregated route to CF. And there was one upstream distributed leaked more specifics.
I think 30min maximum is enough to find out a problem and filter out it's source on their side. Almost nobody did it. Why?
Current thread:
- Re: CloudFlare issues?, (continued)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Mark Tinka (Jun 24)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Fredrik Korsbäck (Jun 24)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Jaden Roberts (Jun 24)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Andree Toonk (Jun 24)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Max Tulyev (Jun 24)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Filip Hruska (Jun 24)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Verizon Routing issue Jared Mauch (Jun 24)
- Re: Verizon Routing issue ML (Jun 24)
- Re: Verizon Routing issue Jared Mauch (Jun 24)
- Re: Verizon Routing issue Max Tulyev (Jun 24)
- Re: Verizon Routing issue Jared Mauch (Jun 24)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Filip Hruska (Jun 24)
- Re: CloudFlare issues? Max Tulyev (Jun 24)