nanog mailing list archives
Re: Software Defined Networks
From: Nick Morrison via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 12:53:55 +0100
On Thu 5. Dec 2019 at 20:38, Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com> wrote:
Peace,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 9:26 PM Ishmael Rufus <sakamura () gmail com> wrote:
You can start by taking a look at Openflow which embraces the SDN concept.
Please do not <edited>
So does anyone still wonder why we have so few women in our field? Real nice, Töma. @moderators, can we have a comment from you please about the acceptability of the language used here? Nick
--
-- Nick
Current thread:
- Software Defined Networks Rod Beck (Dec 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Ishmael Rufus (Dec 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Töma Gavrichenkov (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Nick Morrison via NANOG (Dec 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Töma Gavrichenkov (Dec 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networks lobna gouda (Dec 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Töma Gavrichenkov (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Ishmael Rufus (Dec 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Bryan Holloway (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Jörg Kost (Dec 05)